Byzantine Culture

History · Article

The Theotokos in Byzantine Art

The Virgin Mary was Constantinople's defender and the most depicted figure in Byzantine art. The Hodegetria, Blachernitissa, Eleousa and other types, and the theology behind them.

More Byzantine images survive of the Virgin Mary than of any other subject including Christ, and they are not variations on a single idea. Byzantine art developed a set of distinct compositional types for the Virgin, each with a name, each carrying a different theological emphasis, and each associated with particular shrines, feasts and functions. Recognising them is the first practical skill in reading Byzantine art.

The word Theotokos — “God-bearer,” usually rendered “Mother of God” — is itself the product of an argument, and the argument determined what the images were for.

The Doctrinal Foundation

The title was contested in the fifth century. Nestorius, patriarch of Constantinople from 428, objected to Theotokos on the grounds that Mary bore the human Jesus, not the divine Word, and preferred Christotokos, “Christ-bearer.”

His opponents, led by Cyril of Alexandria, argued that the title was not principally a statement about Mary but about Christ: if the one born of Mary was a single person who is God, then his mother is the mother of God, and to deny the title is to divide Christ into two subjects. The Council of Ephesus in 431 upheld Theotokos, and the Council of Chalcedon in 451 confirmed it.

The consequence for art is direct. Almost every Byzantine image of the Virgin shows her with the Child, because the point of the image is the Incarnation. She is not depicted alone in the standard types; she holds, presents, points to or mourns her son. The few exceptions — the Virgin at the Annunciation, the Virgin orans with hands raised — are precisely the cases where the doctrinal point is made differently.

The Types

Hodegetria — “She who shows the way”

The Virgin holds the Child on her left arm and gestures toward him with her right hand. She looks out at the viewer; he looks out or toward her, and raises his hand in blessing.

This is the most important type, named after the Hodegon monastery in Constantinople, whose icon was believed to have been painted by St Luke and was the city’s palladium. It was carried in weekly processions through the streets and taken on campaign. Its history and its loss in 1453 are described in the icon of the Hodegetria.

The Hodegetria is formal, upright, and intercessory: the gesture is a presentation, not an embrace.

Eleousa — “Merciful,” also called Glykophilousa, “sweetly loving”

Mother and Child press their cheeks together; she inclines her head toward him, and he reaches a hand to her neck or face.

The type appears from the eleventh century and becomes dominant in the Komnenian period. It is the tender counterpart to the Hodegetria’s formality, and it is often read as expressing the Virgin’s foreknowledge of the Passion — the embrace is already a lament. The Vladimir Mother of God is the supreme example.

Blachernitissa / Platytera — “Wider than the heavens”

The Virgin stands frontally with hands raised in prayer, the Child shown in a medallion on her breast as though seen within her.

This type is associated with the Blachernae shrine in Constantinople and is the standard image for the conch of the apse, where it is often called the Platytera. The theology is architectural: the Virgin who contained the uncontainable God is depicted at the point where the church’s sanctuary meets its nave.

Nikopoios — “Victory-bringer”

The Virgin holds a medallion of the Child in front of her with both hands, or holds him frontally on her lap. Associated with imperial and military contexts; a Nikopoios icon was reportedly carried into battle by emperors, and one was captured by the Venetians in 1204 and is in San Marco.

Other types

The Virgin enthroned with the Child on her lap, flanked by angels or saints, is the standard apse composition of the early and middle periods. The Zoodochos Pege, “life-giving spring,” shows her in a fountain basin. The Pelagonitissa shows a struggling, twisting child. Later Balkan and Cretan art multiplied the types considerably.

The City’s Protector

The Virgin’s role in Byzantium was not only devotional; it was civic and military.

Constantinople held two of the most important Marian relics in Christendom: her robe (maphorion) at Blachernae and her girdle at Chalkoprateia. Both were acquired in the fifth century, and both became instruments of state. The robe was carried around the walls during sieges; in 860, when a Rus fleet appeared, the patriarch Photios processed with it along the sea walls and the fleet withdrew, an event he preached about immediately afterwards.

The decisive case is the siege of 626, when the city was attacked by Avars and Persians with the emperor absent. The victory was credited to the Virgin, and from that point the identification of the Theotokos with the defence of Constantinople was formal. The Akathist Hymn’s prologue addresses her as “invincible champion” and thanks her for deliverance from danger — a military formula in a devotional text.

Imperial coinage carried her image from the tenth century. City gates carried her icon. The formula “the city of the Theotokos” was standard.

Development Over Time

Early period (to the 6th century). The Virgin appears in narrative contexts — Annunciation, Nativity, Adoration — and as an enthroned figure. The earliest surviving panel icons, at Sinai, include a Virgin enthroned between saints and angels of the sixth century.

After Ephesus and Chalcedon. Monumental apse images of the Theotokos become standard, and Marian feasts are added to the calendar: the Annunciation, the Nativity of the Virgin, the Presentation, the Dormition.

After iconoclasm. The apse mosaic of Hagia Sophia, unveiled in 867 with a homily by Photios, shows the enthroned Theotokos and is the programmatic statement of the restored image cult.

Komnenian and Palaiologan. Emotional types proliferate; the Virgin’s own biography, drawn from the apocryphal Protevangelium, receives extensive narrative cycles — the fullest is in the inner narthex of the Chora church, where her birth, infancy, presentation and betrothal are told in mosaic over a dozen scenes.

Reading an Image

Faced with a Byzantine Virgin, three questions will place it:

  1. Where is the Child, and what is she doing with him? Left arm and pointing hand: Hodegetria. Cheek to cheek: Eleousa. In a medallion on her breast: Blachernitissa. On her lap, frontal: enthroned or Nikopoios.
  2. What are the abbreviations? The monogram MP ΘY — Meter Theou, Mother of God — appears beside her head in nearly every image. The Child is labelled IC XC.
  3. What is she wearing? A dark red or purple maphorion over a blue tunic, with three stars on the forehead and shoulders signifying virginity before, during and after the birth.

The Feasts and Their Images

Four of the twelve great feasts are Marian, and each generated a fixed compositional type that a viewer can identify anywhere in the Orthodox world.

The Nativity of the Theotokos (8 September). Anna reclining on a bed, attended by women bringing food and washing the newborn in a basin — a domestic interior with midwives, drawn from the apocryphal Protevangelium of James.

The Presentation of the Theotokos in the Temple (21 November). The three-year-old Mary on the temple steps, received by the high priest Zacharias, with her parents and a procession of maidens with candles behind. A secondary scene often shows her seated in the Holy of Holies, fed by an angel.

The Annunciation (25 March). Gabriel striding in from the left, Mary standing or seated at the right, usually with a spindle and purple wool — she was weaving the temple veil when the angel came, another detail from the Protevangelium. The composition is almost always split across the two sides of the sanctuary arch.

The Dormition (15 August). Mary on a bier, the apostles gathered around, Christ standing behind holding her soul as a swaddled infant — an exact inversion of the Nativity, where she holds him. It is placed on the west wall so the congregation passes beneath it leaving the church.

The last is the most theologically compact image in Byzantine art: death as a birth, with the roles reversed, stated without a word.

The Apocryphal Sources

Much of the Marian iconography does not come from the canonical gospels, which say almost nothing about Mary’s life, and knowing the sources makes the images legible.

The Protevangelium of James, a second-century text, supplies her parents Joachim and Anna, her miraculous conception, her childhood in the temple, the wool and the veil, and the betrothal to Joseph by the flowering of his rod. The Dormition narratives, from the fifth century onward, supply the apostles gathered from the ends of the earth and the events at her tomb.

Neither was canonical scripture, and both were formally excluded from the biblical canon. Both were also read, believed, preached on and painted throughout the Byzantine world, and the Chora cycle is essentially a picture book of the Protevangelium.

This is a useful corrective to the idea that Orthodox art is tightly policed by doctrine. The iconography’s textual base is substantially non-canonical, and nobody found that a difficulty.

The Robe and the Girdle

Two relics made the Virgin Constantinople’s civic protector in a concrete, legal sense, and both have long afterlives.

The maphorion — the robe — was brought to Constantinople in the fifth century and kept in a reliquary at the church of Blachernae. It was carried around the walls in emergencies, most famously in 626 and 860, and the Blachernae shrine became the focus of the city’s Marian devotion. It was reportedly destroyed in a fire in 1434, though fragments claimed as parts of it exist in several places.

The girdle was kept at the church of Chalkoprateia. A portion is at the Vatopedi monastery on Mount Athos and is periodically taken on tour; when it was brought to Russia in 2011, something over three million people queued to venerate it, which is a reasonable indication that the practices described here are not historical curiosities.

The theology is the same as for icons and set out in icon veneration: matter can be a point of contact because God took flesh. The politics is the one traced in the Avar siege of 626: a city whose protector is the Mother of God has a defence that does not depend on the emperor being present.

Continue exploring